ArticleAnnals of hematology2024
Mutational heterogeneity in large B-cell lymphoma: insights from paired biopsies.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLarge B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) exhibits striking clinical and molecular heterogeneity. New approaches have emerged to explore tumor heterogeneity and classify LBCL into biological categories. Consequently, the informational requirements from diagnostic samples to provide the necessary information have increased, but the adequacy of single-site biopsies to provide such information is largely unknown. Here we describe spatial and temporal intra-patient variations in the mutational landscape of paired biopsies.
methodsPaired biopsies from 30 patients with LBCL were obtained from spatially distinct sites at the time of primary diagnosis before treatment and/or at a subsequent relapse. The samples were sequenced using a custom designed 59-gene next generation sequencing (NGS) lymphoma panel.
resultsDifferences in detected mutations of pathogenic or likely pathogenic significance were frequent both when comparing paired diagnostic biopsies, 2/6 (33%), and when comparing paired biopsies at primary diagnosis and relapse, 8/16 (50%). Mutational heterogeneity tended to increase with longer time interval between biopsies. Analysis of paired diagnostic and relapse biopsies revealed that certain clones present at diagnosis disappeared, while new clones emerged at relapse. Notably, TP53 mutations were detected in six out of seven patients in an extranodal location. In two cases, TP53 mutation was only detected in the relapse biopsy. Several of the mutations identified in this study are used or under investigation as targets for cancer treatments.
conclusionMulti-site biopsies revealed spatial and temporal mutational heterogeneity in patients with LBCL. Our findings indicate that mutational differences between biopsy pairs can occur at all timepoints examined. This underscores the necessity of performing repeat biopsies with each relapse to capture the full spectrum of genetic aberrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39644335What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.