ArticleThe British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology2026
Investigating dynamics in attentive and inattentive responding together with their contextual correlates using a novel mixture IRT model for intensive longitudinal data.
Article in The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding when mixture models effectively identify careless responding: Simulation and validity evidence.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Improving the comparability of momentary affect assessments and accounting for item-specific effects in within-person affect dynamics.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Dependent latent class partial credit models for careless and insufficient effort responding in online survey data.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- A Beta Mixture Model for Careless Respondent Detection in Visual Analogue Scale Data.Psychometrika · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In ecological momentary assessment (EMA), respondents answer brief questionnaires about their current behaviours or experiences several times per day across multiple days. The frequent measurement enables a thorough grasp of the dynamics inherent in psychological constructs, but it also increases respondent burden. To lower this burden, respondents may engage in careless and insufficient effort responding (C/IER), leaving data contaminated with responses that do not reflect what researchers want to measure. We introduce a novel approach to investigating C/IER in EMA data. Our approach combines a confirmatory mixture item response theory model separating C/IER from attentive behaviour with latent Markov factor analysis. This enables gauging the occurrence of C/IER and studying transitions among states of different response behaviours including their contextual correlates. The approach can be implemented using R packages. An empirical application showcases the approach's efficacy in pinpointing C/IER instances and gaining insights into their underlying causes. We showcase that the approach identifies various C/IER response patterns but requires heterogeneous and negatively worded items to detect straightlining. In a simulation investigating robustness against unaccounted for changes in measurement models underlying attentive responses, the approach proved robust against heterogeneity in loading patterns but not against heterogeneity in factor structures. Extensions to accommodate the latter are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.