Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39644094›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2025

Full identification of a growing and branching network's spatio-temporal structures.

Thibault Chassereau, Florence Chapeland-Leclerc, Éric Herbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thibault ChassereauUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, UMR 8236-LIED, Paris, France.
Florence Chapeland-LeclercUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, UMR 8236-LIED, Paris, France.
Éric HerbertUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, UMR 8236-LIED, Paris, France. Electronic address: eric.herbert@u-paris.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimentally monitoring the kinematics of branching network growth is a tricky task, given the complexity of the structures generated in three dimensions. One option is to drive the network in such a way as to obtain two-dimensional growth, enabling a collection of independent images to be obtained. The density of the network generates ambiguous structures, such as overlaps and meetings, which hinder the reconstruction of the chronology of connections. In this paper, we propose a general method for global network reconstruction. Each network connection is defined by a unique label, enabling it to be tracked in time and space. In this work, we distinguish between lateral and apical branches on the one hand, and extremities on the other. Finally, we reconstruct the network after identifying and eliminating overlaps. This method is then applied to the model filamentous fungus Podospora anserina to reconstruct its growing thallus. We derive criteria for differentiating between apical and lateral branches. We find that the outer ring is favorably composed of apical branches, while densification within the network comes from lateral branches. From this, we derive the specific dynamics of each of the two types. Finally, in the absence of any latency phase during growth initiation, we can reconstruct a time based on the equality of apical and lateral branching collections. This makes it possible to directly compare the growth dynamics of different thalli.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSpatio-Temporal Analysis

Identifiers

PMID39644094
PMCPMC11788500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.