ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024
Impact of Clear Aligners vs Conventional Brackets on Oxidant and Antioxidant Levels: A Case-Control Study.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Relationship Between Orthodontic Malocclusion Severity and Periodontal Clinical and Biochemical Parameters in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Salivary Total Oxidant Status (TOS) and Total Antioxidant Status (TAS) in Orthodontic Patients Treated With Clear Aligners vs Conventional Brackets.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to identify the changes in the levels of total oxidant status (TOS) and total antioxidant status (TAS) in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) samples of patients treated with conventional brackets (CBs) and clear aligners (CAs) over a 30-day period. MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty-four patients who received non-extraction treatment with either CBs or CAs were included in the study. GCF samples were obtained at baseline (T0) and on days 7 (T1) and 30 (T2) following initial phase of treatment. Clinical periodontal parameters were used to determine periodontal conditions of patients. ELISA method was used to determine TAS and TOS levels in GCF samples. RESULTS In the group treated with CAs, TOS levels in GCF were significantly high at T1 but approached T0 after the first month (T2) of treatment. In contrast, the group treated with CBs showed significantly high TOS levels in GCF at both T1 and T2 compared with T0. No significant changes were observed in GCF TAS data at T1 and T2 in either group (CA and CB), compared with T0. When comparing TOS data between the groups at T1 and T2, the CA group had lower TOS levels than the CB group (Mann-Whitney U with Bonferroni correction). Additionally, the CA group had lower periodontal clinical indexes than did the CB group. CONCLUSIONS Oxidative tissue damage during orthodontic teeth movements may be lower with CA treatment. In cases in which higher oxidative stress is anticipated, CA treatment may be preferred over CB treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.