Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39644077›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2024

Ph- ALL: immunotherapy in upfront treatment.

Matthias Stelljes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Matthias StelljesDepartment of Medicine A, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody-based and cell-based novel immunotherapies, such as bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTE), antibody-drug conjugates, or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are currently standard treatment options for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). To date, CD20-targeting monoclonal antibodies and the CD19-targeting BiTE's blinatumomab have been established elements of frontline therapy, either in patients with CD20+ ALL or in patients with measurable disease (MRD) following conventional chemotherapy. Recently, blinatumomab has also demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with MRD-negative ALL. Based on the observed high response rates and improved survival outcomes in patients with R/R ALL, antibody-based immunotherapies are being prospectively studied in the upfront setting, particularly in older adult patients, where even age-adapted conventional chemotherapies are still associated with significant rates of early death, treatment-related toxicity, and poor prognosis. In these approaches, conventional chemotherapy has been replaced or reduced and supplemented by immunotherapeutic agents, resulting in promising outcomes that form the basis for evaluating and defining new treatment standards.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificImmunotherapyAntigens, CD19Antigens, CD20HumansMalePrecursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAntibodies, BispecificAntigens, CD19Antigens, CD20blinatumomab

Identifiers

PMID39644077
PMCPMC11665523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.