ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2024
Ph- ALL: immunotherapy in upfront treatment.
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical characteristics, prognosis, and achievement of transplant in adolescents and adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Argentina.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy · 2026Article
- The combination of alternating reduced-dose blinatumomab and hyper-CVAD as consolidation therapy in patients with newly-diagnosed adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-based and cell-based novel immunotherapies, such as bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTE), antibody-drug conjugates, or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are currently standard treatment options for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). To date, CD20-targeting monoclonal antibodies and the CD19-targeting BiTE's blinatumomab have been established elements of frontline therapy, either in patients with CD20+ ALL or in patients with measurable disease (MRD) following conventional chemotherapy. Recently, blinatumomab has also demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with MRD-negative ALL. Based on the observed high response rates and improved survival outcomes in patients with R/R ALL, antibody-based immunotherapies are being prospectively studied in the upfront setting, particularly in older adult patients, where even age-adapted conventional chemotherapies are still associated with significant rates of early death, treatment-related toxicity, and poor prognosis. In these approaches, conventional chemotherapy has been replaced or reduced and supplemented by immunotherapeutic agents, resulting in promising outcomes that form the basis for evaluating and defining new treatment standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.