ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2024
Are TP53 mutations all alike?
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dihydrosanguinarine: A Review of Its Pharmacology, Structure-Activity Relationship, Toxicity, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- TP53-mutated myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia: a comprehensive overview of targeted approaches.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Pandora's Box of AML: HowBiomedicines · 2025Review
- Clinical and molecular characterization of TP53-mutant acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults.Blood cancer journal · 2025Article
- Long-term follow-up and combined Phase 2 results of eprenetapopt and azacitidine in patients withHemaSphere · 2025Article
- Multi-omics analysis of the tumor microenvironment after metastasis: advancing toward personalized immunotherapy and molecular targeted strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
TP53 is mutated in 10 to 15% of cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and is associated with a previous exposure to cytotoxic therapy, complex cytogenetic abnormalities, and a poor prognosis. Recent data have established the importance of TP53-mutant allele status, the determination of which requires specific genetic testing. Compared with monoallelic disease, multihit TP53-mutant AML/MDS is associated with chromosomal abnormalities and decreased overall survival. Most TP53 mutations are missense mutations that localize to the DNA binding domain. Hot-spot mutations involving residues R175, Y220, G245, R248, R273, or R282 represent approximately 35% of all TP53 missense mutations in AML/MDS. There is evidence that these hot-spot mutations may have dominant negative or gain-of-function properties. Here we review this evidence and discuss its potential impact on patient outcomes and clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.