ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2024
MGCS: where do we stand today?
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance: a multisystem review.Blood cancer journal · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Monoclonal gammopathy associated enteropathy: a potential MGCS related phenotype with response to plasma cell directed therapy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Paraneoplastic leukocytoclastic vasculitis mimicking ulcus cruris as rare initial manifestation of smoldering myeloma IgG kappa.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- [Chinese expert consensus on screening and clinical application of monoclonal immunoglobulins(2025)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monoclonal gammopathies of clinical significance (MGCS) are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by the presence of an indolent B-cell or plasma-cell clone producing a toxic monoclonal immunoglobulin resulting in end-organ dysfunction. MGCS is a clinicopathologic diagnosis that requires the demonstration of a monoclonal immunoglobulin in the correct clinical setting. The most common MGCS syndromes are renal, neurologic, and cutaneous, although hematologic and multi-organ MGCS syndromes are also increasingly recognized. Therapy most commonly targets the underlying clonal population; immunoglobulin-targeting therapies as well as complement and cytokine antagonists have emerged for selected MGCS syndromes and may be temporizing in a subset of patients. Other chapters review renal and neurologic MGCS; this chapter focuses on hematologic and multi-organ MGCS syndromes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.