ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2024
von Willebrand disease and heavy menstrual bleeding: when and how to test.
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Persistent Gingival Bleeding After Scaling: A Diagnostic Clue to von Willebrand Disease.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Preoperative Hemostatic Management for Refractory Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Patients With von Willebrand Disease: A Case Report.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Recombinant von Willebrand factor for von Willebrand disease: mechanism of action and clinical application.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common inherited bleeding disorder caused by von Willebrand factor (VWF) deficiency and is an important cause of heavy menstrual bleeding in young patients. A clinical evaluation using standardized bleeding scores helps determine when screening hemostatic testing is indicated by identifying patients with a moderate or high probability of an inherited bleeding disorder. The diagnosis of VWD is made when VWF levels are under 30 IU/dL or between 30 and 50 IU/dL when there is a positive bleeding history. Activity levels above 100 IU/dL have a high negative predictive value. Multiple factors, including stress from acute bleeding and anemia, pregnancy, and medications, can affect VWF levels, hence testing for VWD is best performed when a person's health is at its baseline level, although this is not always possible in clinical practice. Variation in assay methodologies measuring VWF activity can have a significant impact on the diagnostic evaluation, and it is important for clinicians to be familiar with the limitations of the assay used by their local or reference laboratory. Genetic testing can be useful in establishing the VWD subtype and providing accurate reproductive counseling but is not required to make a diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.