Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39644046›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2024

von Willebrand disease and heavy menstrual bleeding: when and how to test.

Juliana Perez Botero

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Juliana Perez BoteroDivision of Hematopathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common inherited bleeding disorder caused by von Willebrand factor (VWF) deficiency and is an important cause of heavy menstrual bleeding in young patients. A clinical evaluation using standardized bleeding scores helps determine when screening hemostatic testing is indicated by identifying patients with a moderate or high probability of an inherited bleeding disorder. The diagnosis of VWD is made when VWF levels are under 30 IU/dL or between 30 and 50 IU/dL when there is a positive bleeding history. Activity levels above 100 IU/dL have a high negative predictive value. Multiple factors, including stress from acute bleeding and anemia, pregnancy, and medications, can affect VWF levels, hence testing for VWD is best performed when a person's health is at its baseline level, although this is not always possible in clinical practice. Variation in assay methodologies measuring VWF activity can have a significant impact on the diagnostic evaluation, and it is important for clinicians to be familiar with the limitations of the assay used by their local or reference laboratory. Genetic testing can be useful in establishing the VWD subtype and providing accurate reproductive counseling but is not required to make a diagnosis.

Indexed as

Menorrhagiavon Willebrand Diseasesvon Willebrand FactorFemaleGenetic TestingHumansPregnancyvon Willebrand Factor

Identifiers

PMID39644046
PMCPMC11665653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.