Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39644043›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2024

Your chemo is no good here: management of high-risk MCL.

Yazeed Sawalha, Kami Maddocks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yazeed SawalhaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Kami MaddocksDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically considered a lymphoma with limited treatment options and poor outcomes, the treatment landscape in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has evolved remarkably in the last decade. Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) remains the primary frontline treatment for most patients with MCL, typically with an intensive approach in younger and fit patients. The role of consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation remains controversial, with recent data further questioning its benefit. Novel agents have shown promising results in recent frontline clinical trials and challenge the current paradigm in MCL, particularly in high-risk patients who generally have poor outcomes with CIT. Risk stratification is key to incorporating novel agents in the frontline treatment of MCL, identifying patients who do not benefit from or could be spared CIT, guiding treatment intensity and duration, and improving overall outcomes, including safety and quality of life. The MCL International Prognostic Index and Ki-67 play an important role in identifying patients with high-risk MCL. TP53 aberrations, particularly mutations, currently identify patients with the highest risk, limited benefit from CIT, and greatest need for novel therapies. Other genetic aberrations and biological clusters are being identified but currently have limited clinical utility.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Mantle-CellHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansImmunotherapyMutationQuality of LifeTransplantation, AutologousTumor Suppressor Protein p53TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID39644043
PMCPMC11665716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.