Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39644028›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2024

Molecular profiling in MPN: who should have it and why?

Ashlyn Chee, Adam J Mead

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Interferon-JAK-STAT Axis in Bone Metabolism.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ashlyn CheeCancer and Haematology Centre, Department of Clinical Haematology, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Adam J MeadCancer and Haematology Centre, Department of Clinical Haematology, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 26988Cancer Research UK 27723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a group of blood cancers that result from somatic mutations in hematopoietic stem cells, causing constitutive activation of JAK-STAT signaling pathways with consequent overproduction of 1 or more myeloid lineages. The initiating event in MPN pathogenesis is a genetic mutation, and consequently molecular profiling is central to the diagnosis, risk stratification, and, increasingly, monitoring of therapy response in persons with MPN. In this review we summarize current approaches to molecular profiling of classical MPNs (essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, and myelofibrosis), using illustrative clinical case histories to demonstrate how genetic analysis is already fully integrated into MPN diagnostic classification and prognostic risk stratification. Molecular profiling can also be used in MPN to measure response to therapy both in clinical trials and increasingly in routine clinical practice. Taking a forward look, we discuss how molecular profiling in MPN might be used in the future to select specific molecularly targeted therapies and the role of additional genetic methodologies beyond mutation analysis.

Indexed as

Myeloproliferative DisordersGene Expression ProfilingHumansMutationPrognosisSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID39644028
PMCPMC11665577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.