Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39644024›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2024

Maintenance strategies for relapse prevention and treatment.

Emily Geramita, Jing-Zhou Hou, Warren D Shlomchik, Sawa Ito

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily GeramitaHematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Jing-Zhou HouHematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Warren D ShlomchikHematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Sawa ItoHematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Posttransplant relapse is the most significant challenge in allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Posttransplant interventions, in conjunction with optimal conditioning regimens and donor selection, are increasingly supported by evidence for their potential to prolong patient survival by promoting antileukemia or graft-versus-leukemia effects. Our review begins by highlighting the current evidence supporting maintenance therapy for relapse prevention in acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphocytic leukemia. This includes a broad spectrum of strategies, such as targeted therapies, hypomethylating agents, venetoclax, and immunotherapies. We then shift our focus to the role of disease monitoring after alloSCT, emphasizing the potential importance of early detection of measurable residual disease and a drop in donor chimerism. We also provide an overview of salvage therapies for overt relapse, including targeted therapies, chemotherapies, immunotherapies, donor lymphocyte infusion, and selected agents under investigation in ongoing clinical trials. Finally, we review the evidence for a second alloSCT (HSCT2) and discuss factors that impact donor selection for HSCT2.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAllograftsHumansPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaRecurrenceTransplantation ConditioningTransplantation, Homologous

Identifiers

PMID39644024
PMCPMC11665712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.