Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39644014›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2024

How to think about acute leukemia of ambiguous lineage.

Olga K Weinberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Clinical case reports · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Olga K WeinbergUT Southwestern Medical Center, BioCenter, Dallas, TX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classification of acute leukemia involves assigning lineage by resemblance of blasts to normal progenitor cells. This approach provides descriptive information that is useful for disease monitoring, provides clues to pathogenesis, and can help to select effective chemotherapeutic regimens. Acute leukemias of ambiguous lineage (ALAL) are those leukemias that either fail to show evidence of myeloid, B-lymphoid, or T-lymphoid lineage commitment or show evidence of commitment to more than 1 lineage, including mixed-phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL). The different treatment regimens for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) make ALAL a challenge both diagnostically and therapeutically. Current classification criteria have reduced the reported incidence of mixed lineage leukemias by emphasizing fewer markers and categorizing some biphenotypic leukemias with recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities as other entities. Several recent studies have explored the genomic and epigenetic landscape of MPAL and emphasize the genomic heterogeneity of MPAL. Two classification proposals of myeloid malignancies recently been published and include International Consensus Classification and fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours. Our review aims to discuss the diagnostic challenges in the setting of classification updates, recent genomic studies, and therapeutic strategies in this poorly understood disease.

Indexed as

Cell LineageLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteHumansLeukemia, Biphenotypic, AcutePrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

Identifiers

PMID39644014
PMCPMC11665627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.