Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39644013›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2024

End-of-life care for people with sickle cell disease: barriers to and facilitators of high-quality care.

Rushil V Patel, Emily E Johnston

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rushil V PatelDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Emily E JohnstonInstitute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

End-of-life (EOL) care is a critical part of sickle cell disease (SCD) management. However, barriers to high-quality EOL care remain, including (1) disease-related barriers (prior opioid exposure, risk of vaso-occlusive crises, chronic conditions with conflicting needs, and limitations of receiving disease-directed therapy on hospice); (2) communication-related barriers (challenges of identifying and responding to religious and spiritual concerns, limited health literacy, and previous health care system experience); (3) systemic issues (social determinants of health, structural racism, and mistrust of the medical system). However, palliative care and interdisciplinary collaboration can overcome many of these barriers. In addition, we can improve EOL care by accounting for opioid exposures, multimodal symptom management, and exploring (1) who people want involved in decision-making, (2) the role of religion and spirituality in decision-making, and (3) previous experiences with EOL. Systemic barriers can be addressed through the social determinants of health screening, minimizing financial burdens of care, and building longitudinal relationships with people with SCD. This requires the continued education of SCD providers about primary palliative care and palliative care providers about SCD. With such strategies, high-quality EOL care is possible for this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellQuality of Health CareTerminal CareFemaleHumansMalePalliative Care

Identifiers

PMID39644013
PMCPMC11665722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.