ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2024
Mutation- and MRD-informed treatments for transplant-ineligible patients.
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Venetoclax for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy: Prospects, resistance mechanisms and management strategies.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Targeted triplet therapies incorporating FLT3 or IDH inhibitors: ready for prime time?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- Article
- Retrospective analysis of sorafenib combined with interferon α-1b, interleukin-2, and thalidomide as maintenance therapy in FLT3-ITD-positive acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ongoing development of molecularly targeted therapies in addition to the new standard of care combination of azacitidine and venetoclax (AZA-VEN) has transformed the prognostic outlook for older, transplant-ineligible patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). While conventional treatments, such as standard anthracycline and cytarabine- based chemotherapy or hypomethylating agent (HMA) monotherapy, are associated with a generally poor prognosis in this patient population, the use of these novel regimens can result in long-lasting, durable remissions in select patient subgroups. Furthermore, the simultaneous discovery of resistance mechanisms to targeted therapies and AZA-VEN has enabled the identification of patient subgroups with inferior outcomes, leading to the development, of new risk-stratification models and clinical investigations incorporating targeted therapies using an HMA-VEN-based platform. Treatments inclusive of IDH1, IDH2, FLT3, and menin inhibitors combined with HMA-VEN have additionally demonstrated safety and high rates of efficacy in early-phase clinical trials, suggesting these regimens may further improve outcomes within select subgroups of patients with AML in the near future. Additional studies defining the prognostic role of measurable residual disease following VEN-based treatment have further advanced prognostication capabilities and increased the ability for close disease monitoring and early targeted intervention prior to morphologic relapse. This review summarizes these recent developments and their impact on the treatment and survival of transplant-ineligible patients living with AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.