Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39644001›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2024

Mutation- and MRD-informed treatment decisions for the transplant-eligible AML patient.

Michael Heuser, Rabia Shahswar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Cancers · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael HeuserDepartment of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Rabia ShahswarDepartment of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is classified by risk groups according to a number of genetic mutations, which may occur alone or in combination with other mutations and chromosomal abnormalities. Prognosis and appropriate therapy can vary significantly based on a patient's genetic risk group, making mutation-informed decisions crucial to successful management. However, the presence of measurable residual disease (MRD) after induction and consolidation therapy, before hematopoietic cell transplant, and during posttransplant monitoring can be even more significant to patient prognosis than their genetic subtype. Clinicians must select MRD-monitoring methods most appropriate for a patient's genetic profile and a treatment regimen that considers both a patient's primary genetic subgroup and other risk factors, including MRD information. Recent clinical trial data and drug approvals, together with advances in the validation of MRD using next-generation sequencing, require a deeper understanding of the complex AML mutation and MRD matrix, enabling more insightful monitoring and treatment decisions for intensively treated AML patients. Here, we provide an overview on methods and clinical consequences of MRD monitoring in genetic subgroups of patients with AML. As treatment options become more personalized, on-treatment MRD monitoring will become even more important to effective AML care.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMutationNeoplasm, ResidualClinical Decision-MakingHumans

Identifiers

PMID39644001
PMCPMC11665733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.