ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2024
Sequencing bispecific antibodies and CAR T cells for FL.
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- CAR T-cells vs. bispecific antibodies as third- or later-line treatment for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a literature review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Fixed-Duration Subcutaneous Mosunetuzumab in Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Pivotal Phase 2 Primary Analysis.American journal of hematology · 2026Trial
- CD20 × CD3 Bispecific Antibodies in B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: Current Evidence, Therapeutic Integration, and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Towards a chemo-free approach for follicular lymphoma.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
- Review
- Two Are Better than One: The Bi-Specific Antibody Mosunetuzumab Reveals an Improved Immune Response of Vγ9Vδ2 T Cells Targeting CD20 in Malignant B Cells in Comparison to the Mono-Specific Antibody Obinutuzumab.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment for relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) has evolved over recent years with the introduction of multiple novel immunotherapies: anti-CD3 × CD20 bispecific antibody (BsAb) T-cell engagers and anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T). Both drug classes are highly active, and their adverse event profiles overlap considerably, with cytokine release syndrome, cytopenias, and infections being most common. However, key differences include accessibility and logistical considerations as well as distinct neurologic toxicities, which make recommending a BsAb or CAR T a nuanced decision for each patient with R/R FL. Notably, patients could receive both classes of therapies in sequence; however, data guiding this decision are sparse. Considering the 3 most advanced agents in each class, we generally favor BsAbs before CAR T as the standard-of-care third-line treatment for the typical patient with R/R FL without concern for aggressive histologic transformation (HT). This is based on a 3-year follow-up of the mosunetuzumab phase 2 trial in R/R FL highlighting durable complete responses after a time-limited therapy with an acceptable safety profile for patients of all ages and reasonable performance status. We generally prioritize CAR T before BsAbs for patients with proven or suspected HT given the curative-potential of this approach based on trial data from R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; it is unknown whether BsAbs offer the same long-term benefit in transformed FL. Overall, with the ability to personalize the sequencing of BsAbs and CAR T, the recently expanding portfolio of highly effective immunotherapies for R/R FL is poised to offer considerable benefit to this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.