Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39643988›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2024

Has PD-1 blockade changed the standard of care for cHL?

Thomas M Kuczmarski, Ryan C Lynch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas M KuczmarskiUniversity of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Ryan C LynchUniversity of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment paradigm for classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) continues to evolve, particularly in light of the incorporation of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors into a variety of therapeutic settings. PD-1 inhibitors have demonstrated high efficacy and a favorable toxicity profile when added to a doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine chemotherapy backbone in patients with untreated CHL. PD-1 inhibitors are also effective treatment options in the relapsed/refractory setting. For patients who are pursuing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), pembrolizumab plus gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and liposomal doxorubicin has shown marked efficacy and is an effective treatment regimen to administer prior to transplant. For patients who either are not eligible for ASCT or have relapsed after ASCT, pembrolizumab or nivolumab monotherapy have been well studied and demonstrate high efficacy even when patients have been exposed to numerous lines of prior therapy. As data from previous trials continue to mature and new clinical trials are conducted, PD-1 inhibitors will continue to become an integral component for successful management of CHL.

Indexed as

Hodgkin DiseaseProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorStandard of CareAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNivolumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNivolumabPDCD1 protein, humanpembrolizumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptor

Identifiers

PMID39643988
PMCPMC11665719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.