Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39643918›Full record

ReviewClinical epigenetics2024

BRCA1 & BRCA2 methylation as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in cancer: Implementation in liquid biopsy in the era of precision medicine.

Maria Panagopoulou, Theodoros Panou, Anastasios Gkountakos, Gesthimani Tarapatzi, Makrina Karaglani, Ioannis Tsamardinos, Ekaterini Chatzaki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical epigenetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Methylation of theOncology letters · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Higher Levels ofMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Genes · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Panagopoulou *Laboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece. mpanagop@med.duth.gr.
Theodoros Panou *Laboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Anastasios GkountakosLaboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Gesthimani TarapatziLaboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Makrina KaraglaniLaboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Ioannis TsamardinosInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology, 70013, Heraklion, Greece.
Ekaterini ChatzakiLaboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece.

Funding

European Union- Next-Generation EU, Greece 2.0 National Recovery and Resilience plan, National Flagship Initiative "Health and Pharmaceuticals" TAEDR-0535850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBReast CAncer gene 1 (BRCA1) and BReast CAncer gene 2 (BRCA2) encode for tumor suppressor proteins which are critical regulators of the Homologous Recombination (HR) pathway, the most precise and important DNA damage response mechanism. Dysfunctional HR proteins cannot repair double-stranded DNA breaks in mammalian cells, a situation called HR deficiency. Since their identification, pathogenic variants and other alterations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have been associated with an increased risk of developing mainly breast and ovarian cancer. Interestingly, HR deficiency is also detected in tumors not carrying BRCA1/2 mutations, a condition termed "BRCAness". MAIN TEXT: One of the main mechanisms causing the BRCAness phenotype is the methylation of the BRCA1/2 promoters, and this epigenetic modification is associated with carcinogenesis and poor prognosis mainly among patients with breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA1 promoter methylation has been suggested as an emerging biomarker of great predictive significance, especially concerning Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase inhibitors (PARP inhibitor-PARPi) responsiveness, along with or beyond BRCA1/2 mutations. However, as its clinical exploitation is still insufficient, the impact of BRCA1/2 promoter methylation status needs to be further evaluated. The current review aims to gather the latest findings about the mechanisms that underline BRCA1/2 function as well as the molecular characteristics of tumors associated with BRCA1/2 defects, by focusing on DNA methylation. Furthermore, we critically analyze their translational meaning and the validity of BRCA methylation biomarkers in predicting treatment response.

conclusionsWe believe that BRCA1/2 methylation alone or combined with other biomarkers in a clinical setting is expected to change the scenery in prognosis and predicting treatment response in multiple cancer types and is worthy of further attention. The quantitative BRCA1 promoter methylation assessment might predict treatment response in PARPi and analysis of BRCA1/2 methylation in liquid biopsy might define patient subgroups at different time points that may benefit from PARPi. Finally, we suggest a pipeline that could be implemented in liquid biopsy to aid precision pharmacotherapy in BRCA-associated tumors.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsDNA MethylationPrecision MedicinePromoter Regions, GeneticEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA1BRCA2Breast cancerCancerDNA promoter methylationLiquid biopsyOvarianPARP inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID39643918
PMCPMC11622545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.