ArticleBMC cancer2024
Radiomics for differential diagnosis of Bosniak II-IV renal masses via CT imaging.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in the radiologic diagnosis of major urological cancers: a meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Multiphase CT-derived markers for the characterization of large solid and cystic renal masses by histology and grade.Polish journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in patients with HER2-low breast cancer based on ultrasound radiomics.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RATIONALE AND
objectivesThe management of complex renal cysts is guided by the Bosniak classification system, which may be inadequate for risk stratification of patients to determine the appropriate intervention. Radiomics models based on CT imaging may provide additional useful information. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 322 patients with Bosniak II-IV cysts were included in the study from January 2010 to December 2019. Contrast-enhanced CT scans were performed on all patients. ITK-snap was used for segmentation, and the PyRadiomics 3.0.1 package was used for feature extraction. The radiomics features were screened via the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression method. After feature selection, a logistic regression (LR) model, support vector machine (SVM) model and random forest (RF) model were constructed.
resultsIn the present study, 217 benign renal cysts (67.4%) and 105 cystic renal cell carcinomas (32.6%) were identified. According to the Bosniak classification, the sample included 179 (55.6%) Bosniak II cysts, 38 (11.8%) Bosniak IIF cysts, 44 (13.7%) Bosniak III cysts and 61 (18.9%) Bosniak IV cysts. A total of 1334 radiomics features were extracted from both unenhanced and cortical CT scans. After LASSO regression, all the models (LR, SVM and RF) showed satisfactory discrimination and reliability in both unenhanced and cortical CT scans (AUC > 0.950). In the Bosniak IIF-III subgroup analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of the LR model was very low for both the unenhanced and cortical scans. In contrast, the SVM model and RF model showed excellent and stable performance in classifying Bosniak IIF-III cysts. The AUCs of the models were all > 0.85, with a maximum of 0.941. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC of the RF model were 0.889, 0.913, 0.902, and 0.941, respectively.
conclusionOur data indicate that radiomics models can effectively distinguish between cystic renal cell carcinoma (cRCC) and complex renal cysts (Bosniak II-IV). Radiomics models may still have high diagnostic accuracy even for Bosniak IIF-III cysts that are clinically difficult to distinguish. However, external validation of these findings is still needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.