ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2024
Phacovitrectomy vs. consecutive vitrectomy for idiopathic macular holes: short and long-term outcomes and OCT image quality assessment.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare short- and long-term anatomical, functional, and refractive outcomes between combined phacovitrectomy (PVS) and consecutive vitrectomy (CVS) for idiopathic macular holes (MHs). Also, to evaluate the role of preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) image quality in guiding surgical selection.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 183 phakic MH eyes operated between 2012 and 23, with patients divided into PVS and CVS groups. Demographic and ocular data, MH features, visual acuity (VA), refraction changes and postoperative outcomes, and follow-up details were collected. Pre- and post-operative OCT scans were evaluated for MH characteristics, OCT image quality, and surgical outcomes at short-term (≤ 3 months) and long-term (≥ 5 years) intervals.
resultsThe study included 144 eyes in PVS group and 39 in CVS group. Median follow-up duration was 16 months for PVS group and 72 months for CVS group (p < 0.001). Both groups showed significant VA improvements and comparable MH closure rates at short-term follow-up. However, CVS group had significantly better postoperative VA at short-term (p = 0.001) and long-term (p = 0.017) intervals. The preoperative OCT quality index did not significantly differ between groups and was ineffective in assessing cataract grade or guiding surgical decisions. Both groups experienced a myopic refractive shift, with a higher magnitude in the PVS group (p = 0.04). Postoperative complications were similar between the groups.
conclusionCVS achieves better long-term VA than PVS following MH repair, despite similar anatomical outcomes. Preoperative OCT quality index is not effective for guiding surgical decisions, and careful refractive planning is essential, especially for PVS patients, to address postoperative myopic shifts. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.