Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39643893›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2024

Impact of DNA extraction, PCR amplification, sequencing, and bioinformatic analysis on food-associated mock communities using PacBio long-read amplicon sequencing.

Mareike Baer, Lisa Höppe, Waldemar Seel, André Lipski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mareike BaerInstitute of Nutritional and Food Sciences, Food Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Bonn, Friedrich-Hirzebruch-Allee 7, 53115, Bonn, Germany. mabaer@uni-bonn.de.
Lisa HöppeInstitute of Nutritional and Food Sciences, Food Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Bonn, Friedrich-Hirzebruch-Allee 7, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Waldemar SeelInstitute of Nutritional and Food Sciences, Nutrition and Microbiota, University of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 7, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
André LipskiInstitute of Nutritional and Food Sciences, Food Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Bonn, Friedrich-Hirzebruch-Allee 7, 53115, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-read 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing has a high potential for characterizing food-associated microbiomes. The advantage results from sequencing the full-length (1,500 bp) gene, enabling taxonomic resolution at species level. Here we present a benchmarking study using mock communities representative of milking machine biofilms and raw meat, revealing challenges relevant to food-associated habitats. These were varying species abundances, reliable intra-genus differentiation of species, and detection of novel species with < 98.7% sequence identity to type strains. By using mock communities at different levels of preparation - as mixed whole cells, mixed extracted DNA, and mixed PCR products - we systematically investigated the influence of DNA extraction using two different kits, PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes, sequencing, and bioinformatics analysis including reference database and gene copy number normalization on bacterial composition and alpha diversity.

resultsWe demonstrated that PacBio ccs-reads allowed for correct taxonomic assignment of all species present within the mock communities using a custom Refseq database. However, choice of percent identity values for taxonomic assignment had a strong influence on identification and processing of reads from novel species. PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes produced the strongest bias on the observed community composition, while sequencing alone reproduced the preset composition well. The PCR bias can in part be attributed to differences in mol% G + C content of 16S rRNA genes resulting in preferred amplification of low mol% G + C-containing taxa.

conclusionsThis study underlines the importance of benchmarking studies with mock communities representing the habitat of interest to evaluate the methodology prior to analyzing real samples of unknown composition. It demonstrates the advantage of long-read sequencing over short-read sequencing, as species level identification enables in-depth characterization of the habitat. One benefit is improved risk assessment by enabling differentiation between pathogenic and apathogenic species of the same genus.

Indexed as

BacteriaComputational BiologyDNA, BacterialFood MicrobiologyPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNABiofilmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMeatMicrobiotaPhylogenyDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAmplicon sequencingFood microbiotaFull-length 16S rRNA geneLong-read sequencingMock communityPacBio sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39643893
PMCPMC11622462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.