ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Towards improving district health information system data consistency, report completeness and timeliness in Neno district, Malawi.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Augmented Capacity Development Interventions (ACDI) Improved Data Quality Performance in the Routine Health Information System (RHIS): A Cluster Randomized Trial.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingTrial
- Performance of Routine Disease Surveillance in Sub-Saharan Africa (2010-2024): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Core Reporting and Detection Indicators.Health science reports · 2026Review
- A Descriptive Assessment of Healthcare Workers' Preparedness for Digital Health Systems in Malawi.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2026Article
- Revisiting the use and effectiveness of patient-held records in rural Malawi.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuality data is crucial in making informed decisions regarding health services; However, the literature suggests that in many LMICs including Malawi, it remains of poor quality. Data quality is measured in terms of completeness, timeliness and consistency among other parameters. We describe the Ministry of Health's District Health Information System (DHIS2) report completeness and timeliness at three levels: National, South West Zone (SWZ) and Neno district. Further, describe data consistency following data quality assessments (DQA) in Neno district, Malawi.
methodsWe conducted a descriptive retrospective study by extracting DHIS2 report completeness and timeliness at three levels and used DQA data in Neno district between January 2016 and December 2022. We defined report completeness as the number of reports in DHIS2 against those expected, timeliness as the number of reports entered into DHIS2 before the deadline and consistency as the level of agreement between three sources: register, report and DHIS2 system. We presented the data graphically and calculated yearly median reporting rates for weekly, monthly and quarterly reports against the national target of 85%. We utilized a verification factor (VF) of 0-200% to evaluate consistency between three sources in the Neno district. VF exceeding 100% indicated over-reporting, 100% as a perfect match, and less than 100% as under-reporting, with an acceptable 90-110% range.
resultsDuring the study period, we found increased trends in weekly, monthly and quarterly report completeness at all three levels but were below 85%. Neno district surpassed the target from 2020 onward for weekly reports and from 2019 onward for monthly reports. Similar increased trends were observed for report timeliness with below threshold of 85% except for Neno district monthly report from 2021 onward. We found inconsistencies in data entry from the report to DHIS2 (VF: >90% - <110%) in Neno district. Similarly, under and over-reporting occurred between the register and the report (VF: <90% and > 110%) were observed. These findings should be considered when using DHIS2 for decision-making.
conclusionIn general, we found increased completeness and timeliness rates at all three levels, however, less than the set target of 85%. We suggest continued support, including routine DQAs and report monitoring, towards improving DHIS2 data quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.