Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39643867›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2024

Agent-based modelling of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission: a systematic review.

Viet Long Bui, Angus E Hughes, Romain Ragonnet, Michael T Meehan, Alec Henderson, Emma S McBryde, James M Trauer

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Viet Long BuiSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. viet.bui1@monash.edu.
Angus E HughesSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Romain RagonnetSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Michael T MeehanAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Alec HendersonAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Emma S McBrydeAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
James M TrauerSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council DE230100730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional epidemiological models tend to oversimplify the transmission dynamics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) to replicate observed tuberculosis (TB) epidemic patterns. This has led to growing interest in advanced methodologies like agent-based modelling (ABM), which can more accurately represent the complex heterogeneity of TB transmission.

objectivesTo better understand the use of agent-based models (ABMs) in this context, we conducted a systematic review with two main objectives: (1) to examine how ABMs have been employed to model the intricate heterogeneity of M.tb transmission, and (2) to identify the challenges and opportunities associated with implementing ABMs for M.tb. SEARCH

methodsWe conducted a systematic search following PRISMA guidelines across four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, and Scopus), limiting our review to peer-reviewed articles published in English up to December 2022. Data were extracted by two investigators using a standardized extraction tool. Prospero registration: CRD42022380580. SELECTION CRITERIA: Our review included peer-reviewed articles in English that implement agent-based, individual-based, or microsimulation models of M.tb transmission. Models focusing solely on in-vitro or within-host dynamics were excluded. Data extraction targeted the methodological, epidemiological, and computational characteristics of ABMs used for TB transmission. A risk of bias assessment was not conducted as the review synthesized modelling studies without pooling epidemiological data.

resultsOur search initially identified 5,077 studies, from which we ultimately included 26 in our final review after exclusions. These studies varied in population settings, time horizons, and model complexity. While many incorporated population heterogeneity and household structures, some lacked essential features like spatial structures or economic evaluations. Only eight studies provided publicly accessible code, highlighting the need for improved transparency. AUTHORS'

conclusionsABMs are a versatile approach for representing complex disease dynamics, particularly in cases like TB, where they address heterogeneous mixing and household transmission often overlooked by traditional models. However, their advanced capabilities come with challenges, including those arising from their stochastic nature, such as parameter tuning and high computational expense. To improve transparency and reproducibility, open-source code sharing, and standardised reporting are recommended to enhance ABM reliability in studying epidemiologically complex diseases like TB.

Indexed as

Mycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisEpidemiological ModelsHumansSystems AnalysisAgent-based modellingMycobacterium tuberculosisTransmissionTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID39643867
PMCPMC11622501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.