Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39643824›Full record

ReviewAdvances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology2025

Food and Forest Industry Waste Reuse Using Mixed Microflora.

Elias Hakalehto, Anneli Heitto, Frank Adusei-Mensah, Ari Jääskeläinen, Reino Laatikainen, Jukka Kivelä, Erik Dahlquist, Jan den Boer, Emilia den Boer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elias HakalehtoUniversity of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Anneli HeittoFinnoflag Oy, Kuopio, Finland.
Frank Adusei-MensahUniversity of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Ari JääskeläinenSavonia University of Applied Sciences, Kuopio, Finland.
Reino LaatikainenUniversity of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Jukka KiveläUniversity of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Erik DahlquistDivision of Sustainable Energy Systems, School of Business Society and Engineering, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.
Jan den BoerWroclaw University of Technology, Wroclaw, Poland.
Emilia den BoerWroclaw University of Technology, Wroclaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organic raw materials are the renewable sources of substrates for our industries and for our microbial communities. As industrial, agricultural or forestry side streams, they are usually affordable raw materials if the process entities, equipment and protocols are properly designed. The microbial communities that are used as biocatalysts take care of the process development together with the process team. Moreover, they constitute or shape the process to resemble the natural bioprocess as it takes place or occurs in nature and thus make it "Industry Like Nature®" - type of endeavor. As an ultimate result, we could make our industries increasingly 100% sustainable with the help of microbes. In case of food or forest industry side streams, this means fossil-free production of valuable chemicals, food and feed components, energy and gases, and soil improvement agents or organic fertilizers. The so-called "Finnoflag biorefinery" idea has been tested in many cases together with domestic and international colleagues and industries. In here, we attempt to share the basic thinking.

Indexed as

Food IndustryForestryForestsIndustrial WasteRecyclingIndustrial WasteBio-based food supplementationBioprocess optimizationForest industry side streamsMicrobial metabolismNon-aseptic reactors

Identifiers

PMID39643824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.