ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Detecting and Mitigating the Clever Hans Effect in Medical Imaging: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benchmarking biomedical foundation models.Nature methods · 2026Review
- Deep Learning Optimisation Strategies for Uveal Melanoma Detection Using Ultra-Widefield Photography.Research square · 2026Article
- Digital health technologies in medicine: evidence, artificial intelligence integration, and ethical challenges.Infectious agents and cancer · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a deep learning model for identifying high-quality laryngoscopic images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mask of Truth: Model Sensitivity to Unexpected Regions of Medical Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Skull-stripping induces shortcut learning in MRI-based Alzheimer's disease classification.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Automated DFU detection through GA-selected CNN ensemble with Grad-CAM interpretability.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Leveraging artificial intelligence to validate traditional biomarkers and drug targets in liver cancer recovery: a mini review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Challenges and Future Perspectives for Artificial Intelligence in Hepatology: Breaking Barriers for Better Care.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Clever Hans effect occurs when machine learning models rely on spurious correlations instead of clinically relevant features and poses significant challenges to the development of reliable artificial intelligence (AI) systems in medical imaging. This scoping review provides an overview of methods for identifying and addressing the Clever Hans effect in medical imaging AI algorithms. A total of 173 papers published between 2010 and 2024 were reviewed, and 37 articles were selected for detailed analysis, with classification into two categories: detection and mitigation approaches. Detection methods include model-centric, data-centric, and uncertainty and bias-based approaches, while mitigation strategies encompass data manipulation techniques, feature disentanglement and suppression, and domain knowledge-driven approaches. Despite the progress in detecting and mitigating the Clever Hans effect, the majority of current machine learning studies in medical imaging do not report or test for shortcut learning, highlighting the need for more rigorous validation and transparency in AI research. Future research should focus on creating standardized benchmarks, developing automated detection tools, and exploring the integration of detection and mitigation strategies to comprehensively address shortcut learning. Establishing community-driven best practices and leveraging interdisciplinary collaboration will be crucial for ensuring more reliable, generalizable, and equitable AI systems in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.