Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39643816›Full record

ReviewCurrent microbiology2024

Is Lactococcus lactis a Suitable Candidate for Use as a Vaccine Delivery System Against Helicobacter pylori?

Faria Hasanzadeh Haghighi, Hadi Farsiani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Faria Hasanzadeh HaghighiDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Hadi FarsianiAntimicrobial Resistance Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Azadi-Square, Medical Campus, Mashhad, 9177948564, Iran. farsianih@mums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4738-0245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori was described in 1979. This bacterium, which thrives in the harsh conditions of the stomach, is typically acquired during childhood and can remain colonized for life. Approximately, 90% of the global population is affected, and H. pylori is linked to various conditions, including gastritis, peptic ulcers, lymphoproliferative gastric lymphoma, and even gastric cancer. Currently, antibiotics are the primary treatment method, but the associated challenges of antibiotic use have led to the consideration of oral vaccination as a viable preventive measure against this infection. However, the stomach's harsh environment characterized by its acidic conditions and numerous proteolytic enzymes poses significant obstacles to the development and effectiveness of oral vaccines. To address these challenges, researchers have proposed and evaluated several delivery systems. One of the most promising options is the use of probiotics. Among the various probiotics, Lactococcus lactis stands out as a suitable candidate for oral vaccine delivery against H. pylori due to the advancements in genetic engineering that have been applied to it. This review article discusses the limitations of current treatment strategies and rationalizes the shift toward vaccination, particularly oral vaccination for this infection. It also explores the advantages and challenges of using probiotic bacteria, with a focus on L. lactis as a delivery system. Ultimately, despite the existing challenges, L. lactis continues to be recognized as a promising delivery system. Nonetheless, further research is essential to fully assess its effectiveness and address the challenges associated with this approach.

Indexed as

Bacterial VaccinesHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriLactococcus lactisProbioticsAdministration, OralAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansVaccinationBacterial Vaccines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.