ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2025
Innovation through collaboration: Identifying opportunities to improve congenital anomalies surveillance in Canada.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
settingThe burden of congenital anomalies is a significant public health concern. In response to the World Health Organization's recommendations, Canada developed and strengthened congenital anomalies surveillance to build capacity for prevention and optimal health outcomes. Historically, the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) exclusively used hospital discharge data for the Canadian Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System (CCASS). A primary objective of the CCASS is to report prevalence, trends, and factors associated with congenital anomalies in Canada. However, the purpose of hospital discharge data is not for congenital anomalies surveillance; therefore, enhanced local data, which have more complete case ascertainment and additional data quality measures, are necessary.
interventionRecognizing these significant limitations, PHAC, the provincial and territorial governments, physicians, public health practitioners, and academics collaborated on a project to enhance the CCASS with regional data and expertise. Subsequently, the Government of Canada InfoBase platform will use this enhanced dataset for national reporting. OUTCOMES: We developed standardized case definitions, a data submission form, and data quality tools, and surveyed programs to describe local congenital anomalies surveillance practice, and to identify barriers and facilitators that impact congenital anomalies surveillance efforts. IMPLICATIONS: This synergistic collaboration across jurisdictions, disciplines, and health care sectors is essential to support Canada's enhanced congenital anomalies surveillance. We identified common themes on funding, operational requirements, data standardization, and legal and privacy considerations from the survey. These themes can be used to inform policy and decision-makers for sustainable congenital anomalies surveillance and to amplify the current momentum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.