ArticleLasers in medical science2024
Effect of nutritional stress and photobiomodulation protocol on in vitro viability and proliferation of murine preosteoblast cells.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Photobiomodulation With 976 nm Diode Laser Enhances Osteoblastic Differentiation of Saos-2 Cells Cultured on Collagen Membranes.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the impact of nutritional conditions and irradiation parameters on the viability and proliferation of murine preosteoblasts. MC3T3-E1 cells were maintained under standard culture conditions (αMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum) or nutritional deficit conditions (αMEM without serum) and irradiated or not (control) with an InGaAlP diode laser at wavelengths of 660 nm (red) or 790 nm (infrared), with doses of 1, 4, or 6 J/cm², in a single dose in continuous mode. Cell viability and proliferation were assessed 24, 48, and 72 h after irradiation using the Alamar blue reduction assay. The cell cycle and events related to cell death were evaluated via propidium iodide (PI) staining and Annexin V/PI assays, respectively, through flow cytometry. The data revealed that in cells cultured with normal nutrition (10% FBS), there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in cell viability or proliferation among the different irradiation protocols. In contrast, in the experiments conducted under nutritional deficiency, the infrared laser at a dose of 6 J/cm² significantly increased (p < 0.05) cell viability and proliferation compared with those of the control group at 72 h. The data were confirmed by cell cycle and cell death events (Annexin V/PI) assays. These results suggest that in vitro PBM yields more consistent biostimulatory effects on pre-osteoblasts subjected to nutritional deficiency, highlighting the need for attention to simulate these conditions in studies with laser therapy in in vitro bone disease models and in in vitro experiments using PBM for bone tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39643747What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.