Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39643729›Full record

ArticleNature biomedical engineering2025

Simple and effective embedding model for single-cell biology built from ChatGPT.

Yiqun Chen, James Zou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mapping Gene Expression to an Interpretable Semantic Space.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An AI-Powered Trisomy 21 Research Assistant.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Lense: Optimizing data preprocessing in single-cell omics using LLMs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluating the Utilities of Foundation Models in Single-Cell Data Analysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  20. Protein foundation models: a comprehensive survey.Science China. Life sciences · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yiqun ChenDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4100-1507
James ZouDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. jamesz@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-4764

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale gene-expression data are being leveraged to pretrain models that implicitly learn gene and cellular functions. However, such models require extensive data curation and training. Here we explore a much simpler alternative: leveraging ChatGPT embeddings of genes based on the literature. We used GPT-3.5 to generate gene embeddings from text descriptions of individual genes and to then generate single-cell embeddings by averaging the gene embeddings weighted by each gene's expression level. We also created a sentence embedding for each cell by using only the gene names ordered by their expression level. On many downstream tasks used to evaluate pretrained single-cell embedding models-particularly, tasks of gene-property and cell-type classifications-our model, which we named GenePT, achieved comparable or better performance than models pretrained from gene-expression profiles of millions of cells. GenePT shows that large-language-model embeddings of the literature provide a simple and effective path to encoding single-cell biological knowledge.

Indexed as

Computational BiologySingle-Cell AnalysisAlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.