Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39643696›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2025

Crosstalk between glomeruli and tubules.

Agnes B Fogo, Raymond C Harris

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Chronic Elevated Consumption ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Agnes B FogoDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Raymond C HarrisDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. Ray.harris@vumc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8025-0883

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Models of kidney injury have classically concentrated on glomeruli as the primary site of injury leading to glomerulosclerosis or on tubules as the primary site of injury leading to tubulointerstitial fibrosis. However, current evidence on the mechanisms of progression of chronic kidney disease indicates that a complex interplay between glomeruli and tubules underlies progressive kidney injury. Primary glomerular injury can clearly lead to subsequent tubule injury. For example, damage to the glomerular filtration barrier can expose tubular cells to serum proteins, including complement and cytokines, that would not be present in physiological conditions and can promote the development of tubulointerstitial fibrosis and progressive decline in kidney function. In addition, although less well-studied, increasing evidence suggests that tubule injury, whether primary or secondary, can also promote glomerular damage. This feedback from the tubule to the glomerulus might be mediated by changes in the reabsorptive capacity of the tubule, which can affect the glomerular filtration rate, or by mediators released by injured proximal tubular cells that can induce damage in both podocytes and parietal epithelial cells. Examining the crosstalk between the various compartments of the kidney is important for understanding the mechanisms underlying kidney pathology and identifying potential therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

Kidney DiseasesKidney GlomerulusKidney TubulesAnimalsHumansPodocytes

Identifiers

PMID39643696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.