Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39643661›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025

Perceptions of severity and their influence on reproductive decision-making following reproductive genetic carrier screening.

Elisha Swainson, Erin Tutty, Lucinda Freeman, Lisa Dive, Belinda Dawson McClaren, Alison D Archibald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Editorial: severity in a genomic age.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elisha SwainsonGraduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Erin TuttyGenomics in Society, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lucinda FreemanGraduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lisa DiveGraduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6655-5138
Belinda Dawson McClarenGenomics in Society, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1372-8258
Alison D ArchibaldGenomics in Society, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. alison.archibald@mcri.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4496-8262

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of severity in healthcare is multidimensional and subjective. It is a primary consideration in reproductive genetic carrier screening design where the focus is providing reproductive couples with information about the chance of severe genetic conditions in their offspring. When offering this screening, it is important to understand how condition severity is perceived and incorporated into reproductive decision-making. We analysed data from 41 semi-structured interviews with people who received a screening result indicating an increased chance for having children with a genetic condition. Thematic analysis revealed a desire for comprehensive information about the condition including clinical features, prognosis, impact on quality of life and treatment/management options. Participants integrated this information with their personal circumstances, beliefs/values and lived experience to form a perception of the severity of the condition. For rare and reduced-penetrance conditions where clinical information was limited or ambiguous, decision-making was more complex and greater anxiety was experienced. For conditions with a severity spectrum, reproductive decisions were based on the 'worst-case' clinical presentation. Where the impact of the condition was perceived as significant, the imperative to avoid that condition in future children appeared to be the greatest. Participants reported feeling that knowing their increased reproductive chance of the condition conferred a responsibility to avoid the condition, to prevent suffering and/or reduced quality of life for their children and future generations. These findings offer critical insight into how severity is perceived and the role it plays in reproductive decision-making and justifies a carefully considered approach to screening panel design.

Indexed as

Decision MakingGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic CounselingGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic TestingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeReproduction

Identifiers

PMID39643661
PMCPMC11839978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.