ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025
Perceptions of severity and their influence on reproductive decision-making following reproductive genetic carrier screening.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Considering seriousness in preconception carrier screening: a framework to support policy deliberation.Journal of community genetics · 2026Review
- Patient Perspectives, Unmet Needs and Dilemmas in Reproductive Decision-making for Genodermatoses: A Qualitative Interview Study.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Article
- Facing suffering honestly: On severity, utility, and the public good in reproductive genetic carrier screening.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Outcomes of the national premarital genetic screening program for cystic fibrosis, homocystinuria, and spinal muscular atrophy in Qatar.Human genomics · 2026Article
- Prospective parents' views on reproductive genetic carrier screening: "You know better, you do better".Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Article
- Editorial: severity in a genomic age.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of severity in healthcare is multidimensional and subjective. It is a primary consideration in reproductive genetic carrier screening design where the focus is providing reproductive couples with information about the chance of severe genetic conditions in their offspring. When offering this screening, it is important to understand how condition severity is perceived and incorporated into reproductive decision-making. We analysed data from 41 semi-structured interviews with people who received a screening result indicating an increased chance for having children with a genetic condition. Thematic analysis revealed a desire for comprehensive information about the condition including clinical features, prognosis, impact on quality of life and treatment/management options. Participants integrated this information with their personal circumstances, beliefs/values and lived experience to form a perception of the severity of the condition. For rare and reduced-penetrance conditions where clinical information was limited or ambiguous, decision-making was more complex and greater anxiety was experienced. For conditions with a severity spectrum, reproductive decisions were based on the 'worst-case' clinical presentation. Where the impact of the condition was perceived as significant, the imperative to avoid that condition in future children appeared to be the greatest. Participants reported feeling that knowing their increased reproductive chance of the condition conferred a responsibility to avoid the condition, to prevent suffering and/or reduced quality of life for their children and future generations. These findings offer critical insight into how severity is perceived and the role it plays in reproductive decision-making and justifies a carefully considered approach to screening panel design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.