Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39643656›Full record

ArticleNpj mental health research2024

Detecting and tracking depression through temporal topic modeling of tweets: insights from a 180-day study.

Ranganathan Chandrasekaran, Suhas Kotaki, Abhilash Hosaagrahaara Nagaraja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Npj mental health research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ranganathan ChandrasekaranDepartment of Information & Decision Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. ranga@uic.edu.
Suhas KotakiDepartment of Information & Decision Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abhilash Hosaagrahaara NagarajaDepartment of Information & Decision Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression affects over 280 million people globally, yet many cases remain undiagnosed or untreated due to stigma and lack of awareness. Social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter) offer a way to monitor and analyze depression markers. This study analyzes Twitter data 90 days before and 90 days after a self-disclosed clinical diagnosis. We gathered 246,637 tweets from 229 diagnosed users. CorEx topic modeling identified seven themes: causes, physical symptoms, mental symptoms, swear words, treatment, coping/support mechanisms, and lifestyle, and conditional logistic regression assessed the odds of these themes occurring post-diagnosis. A control group of healthy users (284,772 tweets) was used to develop and evaluate machine learning classifiers-support vector machines, naive Bayes, and logistic regression-to distinguish between depressed and non-depressed users. Logistic regression and SVM performed best. These findings show the potential of Twitter data for tracking depression and changes in symptoms, coping mechanisms, and treatment use.

Identifiers

PMID39643656
PMCPMC11624259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.