ArticleCommunications biology2024
Genomic differences of patients with hematologic malignancies in different age groups.
Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Burden of haematological malignancies among children, adolescents and young adults: Global and high-income region insights from the GBD 2021 study.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hematologic malignancies cause significant morbidity/mortality in both children and young adults (CYAs) as well as older adults (OAs). Yet their biological underpinnings remain inadequately understood. Here, we analyzed clinical and genomic disparities between CYAs and OAs in various hematologic malignancies. We found substantial differences in clinical features such as patient sex, ethnicity, metastasis rates, and tumor subtypes. Genomically, most CYA hematologic malignancies indicated lower mutational burden. Subsequently, we identified differentially mutated genes (DMGs) with varying mutation rates between CYAs and OAs, noting fewer mutations in CYAs for most genes such as TP53, TET2, and DNMT3A. In contrast, several DMGs (i.e., NRAS, KRAS, SMARCA4, ID3, PTPN11, WT1, and KIT) were overrepresented in CYAs. We further investigated human protein interacting partners of these identified DMGs that were highly mutated in CYAs/OAs, respectively, and found significant differences in network topological and functional roles. Notably, CYA malignancies demonstrated extensive copy number alterations (CNAs) and more driver gene fusions. In particular, four CNA differential genes (i.e., ARID1B, MYB, TP53, and ESR1) were overrepresented as amplifications and deletions in CYAs and OAs, respectively. Ultimately, we demonstrated a landscape comparative view of clinically actionable genetic events in CYAs and OAs, providing clues for age-related personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.