ArticleJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2024
Patient-Perceived Vocal Effort Immediately Following Voice Tasks in Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia (ADLD).
Article in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Components of Vocal Effort in Transgender Women.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Minimal Detectable Change of Experienced and Novice Listeners' Ratings of Overall Severity of Voice Quality in Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study examined the relationship between patient-perceived vocal effort (VE) using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VE-VAS) and the OMNI Vocal Effort Scale (OMNI-VES) when measures were obtained after a vocal activity. A second purpose was to evaluate how VE related to other voice assessment measures.
methodFifty-three speakers with adductor laryngeal dystonia (ADLD) provided speech recordings. Directly after this vocal activity, speakers rated VE using the VE-VAS and the OMNI-VES. Speakers provided ratings of their own voice quality severity using a 100-mm VAS (ADLD-OS) and completed the Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) scale. Ten experienced speech-language pathologists rated a subset of available speech samples (n = 39) for overall voice severity using a 100-mm VAS (SLP-OS).
resultsThere was a strong, significant correlation (r = 0.78, P < 0.001) between the VE-VAS and the OMNI-VES. Both VE measures were strongly and significantly correlated with speakers' ratings of their voice: VE-VAS vs ADLD-OS, r = 0.75, P < 0.001; OMNI-VES vs ADLD-OS, r = 0.85, P < 0.001. In contrast, mostly weak correlations were found between perceived VE and V-RQOL total and physical domains, respectively (VE-VAS vs V-RQOL: r = -0.21 to -0.19, P > 0.05; OMNI-VES vs V-RQOL: r = -0.37 to -0.44, P < 0.01). Finally, VE measures were moderately and significantly related to SLPs' auditory-perceptual measures of voice severity: VE-VAS vs SLP-OS, r = 0.50, P < 0.001; OMNI-VES vs SLP-OS, r = 0.57, P < 0.001.
conclusionsADLD speakers' perceptions of VE are strongly related when measures are obtained directly after a vocal activity, regardless of the VE scale. VE is strongly related to speaker-rated voice quality severity, but weakly related to V-RQOL. Measures of VE obtained directly after a vocal activity are moderately related to clinicians' perceptions of overall voice quality severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.