ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2025
Memory screening in the community: Facilitating earlier dementia diagnosis and care-Preliminary data.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- When Policy Exists but Practice Fails: Rethinking Cognitive Screening as a Public Health Delivery Problem.Preventing chronic disease · 2026Article
- Primary healthcare professionals' perspectives on mobility limitation assessment and predictive model optimization for community-dwelling older adults: a qualitative research.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Memory screening in the community: Facilitating earlier dementia diagnosis and care-Preliminary data.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis program evaluation was conducted to assess the effectiveness of a community memory screening initiative across 25 Aging and Disability Resource Centers, spanning 39 counties and 5 tribal communities in the state of Wisconsin.
methodsWe evaluated the screened individuals' characteristics and reasons for screening, the screen results and topics addressed during screening, the rate of sending positive screens to primary care providers, and the incidence of subsequent dementia diagnosis as well as health behavior changes.
resultsProgram evaluation results showed 791 completed surveys from individuals, indicating the program's accessibility and potential to reach populations in both urban and rural counties across Wisconsin. Evaluation results also showed that brain health was the most frequently discussed topic during memory screens (discussed during 689 screens, 87.1%), along with other topics such as potential causes of dementia symptoms (670 screens, 84.5%), dementia warning signs (656, 83%), the importance of early detection (605 screens, 76.5%), and caregiver support (106 screens, 13.4%). Of all 791, a total of 273 (34.5%) individuals had screen results sent to a primary care provider. Follow-up surveys completed with a subset of individuals (n = 49) who had their results sent to a primary care provider indicated that 10 (20%) received a diagnosis of dementia and over half made a health behavior change to improve brain health.
conclusionsThe evaluation results presented herein highlight the program's success in addressing the critical need for accessible dementia-related services. Overall, our evaluation results underscore the importance of community-based initiatives in promoting early dementia detection and intervention, which are crucial for disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.