Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39643095›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2025

Smoking Assessment by Visit Modality Among Community-based Primary Care Clinics.

Steffani R Bailey, Jennifer A Lucas, Heather Holderness, Kristin Lyon-Scott, Jeremy Erroba, Susan A Flocke, AnnMarie Overholser, Hilary A Tindle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Steffani R BaileyDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: bailstef@ohsu.edu.
Jennifer A LucasDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Heather HoldernessDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Kristin Lyon-ScottOCHIN Inc, Portland, Oregon.
Jeremy ErrobaDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Susan A FlockeDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
AnnMarie OverholserOCHIN Inc, Portland, Oregon.
Hilary A TindleDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Centers, Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

CONNECT: COmpreheNsive traiNing and Engagement in Cessation TreatmentR01CA255016 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Steffani R Bailey · 2021 to 2026
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA255016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrimary care delivery in the United States, including tobacco treatment, was negatively impacted by the COVID-19 public health emergency, leading to pandemic-related cessation disparities. Early in the public health emergency, rates of tobacco assessment during telehealth visits were substantially lower than during in-person visits. It is unknown if these changes persisted.

methodsElectronic health record data were extracted and analyzed in 2024 from adult patients with ≥1 primary care visit to a primary care community-based health clinic between 01/01/2019 and 05/31/2023 (N=1,792,934 patients from 541 clinics in 17 states). The monthly percentage of visits with smoking assessment (yes/no) were examined overall and by visit modality.

resultsPrior to March 2020, <1% of visits were via telehealth. In the months following, >50% were via telehealth, leveling to 25% in the later study months. Prior to the public health emergency, >95% of all visits included smoking assessment; the highest monthly percentage after the public health emergency declaration was 77%. For in-person visits, assessments occurred at >95% of visits in each study month prior to March 2020, with subsequent percentages ranging from 46% (April 2020) to 95% (May 2023). In contrast, assessment during telehealth visits reached a maximum of 9% in late 2022.

conclusionsSmoking assessment remained consistently lower during the public health emergency compared with the months prior, primarily driven by lack of assessment during telehealth visits. Concerted efforts are needed to ensure that telehealth visits are leveraged to promote equitable smoking assessment and delivery of evidence-based tobacco treatment among a patient population with high rates of tobacco use.

Indexed as

COVID-19Primary Health CareSmokingTelemedicineAdultAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2United States

Identifiers

PMID39643095
PMCPMC11830536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.