ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2025
Medication disposal within reach: Assessing implementation of permanent disposal receptacles in community pharmacies.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The minivisit method: Adapting opioid-related educational outreach for community pharmacies.Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhAArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAvailability of medication disposal receptacles is critical to curbing nonmedical opioid use and diversion; however, availability in community pharmacies is sparse. The objective of this study was to describe implementation of the community pharmacy medication disposal program offered by the HEALing Communities Study in Kentucky (HCS-KY) using the EPIS (Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment) framework.
methodsSixteen counties participated in the HCS-KY from 1/1/2020-12/31/2023. Exploration and Preparation included gathering and review of evidence-based literature, state/community data, and key opinion leader input to develop a detailed implementation plan. Implementation and Sustainment were assessed using implementation outcome data collected (e.g., number of receptacles placed, amount of drug returned) and semi-structured qualitative interviews to evaluate common themes, including barriers and facilitators related to implementation and sustainment.
resultsDisposal receptacles were placed in 59 pharmacies within the 16 HCS-KY counties. Following implementation, the median number of receptacles per participating county increased significantly from 2.5 to 4.5 (p<0.001). A total of 8019.9 pounds of drug were returned during the study period, with a median per-county return rate of 230.5 pounds per year. Twenty-one pharmacy representatives participated in qualitative interviews. Most (70.0 %) reported weekly receptacle usage; however, few (35.0 %) reported routinely discussing disposal with patients. While 42.9 % reported no barriers, the most frequently reported barrier (33.3 %) was receptacle limitations (e.g., only available during business hours, dosage form restrictions).
conclusionsImplementation of the HCS-KY community pharmacy medication disposal program led to notable increases in disposal locations that were highly utilized by communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.