ArticleEnvironment international2024
Understanding prenatal household exposures to per- and polyfluorylalkyl substances using paired Biological and dust measurements with sociodemographic and housing variables.
Article in Environment international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Collection of multimedia measurements to evaluate PFAS human exposure sources in the residential environment.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are chemicals of concern-they are ubiquitous, persistent, with known and suspected health impacts. Well studied, primary sources of exposure to PFAS are drinking water and food. The presence of PFAS in human tissue of general populations suggests other important exposure sources/pathways. House dust measurements suggest widespread presence of PFAS in residences. Limited studies report paired analyses of PFAS occurrence in indoor media and PFAS concentrations in serum. While paired samples of house dust and blood serum are currently rare, the National Children's Study (NCS) contains paired samples, as well as sociodemographic information, from pregnant people that participated in the study. These archived NCS data and specimens for 104 participants collected between 2009 and 2014 were leveraged and analyzed for 16 commonly measured PFAS. We evaluated PFAS levels in the home, and the relationships between PFAS in dust and serum, and sociodemographic or housing variables. In addition, mechanistic exposure models, and then steady-state serum level models with simple parameters were used to estimate dust contributions of PFAS to serum. The geometric means for the most commonly found PFAS (full names in table 1) in serum were: 4.1 ng/mL for PFOS, 1.1 ng/mL for PFOA, 0.87 ng/mL for PFHxS, 0.16 ng/mL for PFDA. The geometric means of PFAS in dust were: 17 µg/kg for PFOS, 16 µg/kg for PFOA, 9.6 µg/kg for PFDS, 4.5 µg/kg for PFHpA, 4.4 µg/kg for PFNA, 3.9 µg/kg for PFHxS, 3.5 µg/kg for PFDA, 2.3 µg/kg for PFDoA, 2.1 µg/kg for PFUdA. PFOA was significantly correlated in serum and dust as was the sum of all PFAS detected in > 50 % of serum and dust. PFAS in serum was significantly associated with: Higher income, recent renovations, years lived in the home, and educational attainment. PFAS in dust was significantly associated with: Higher participant age, type of home, amount of carpet, educational attainment, higher income, recent renovation, and membership in the military. For some PFAS, 25 % of the overall exposure, on average, is from dust, but for others, 3-4 % is attributed to dust. We were able to identify important associations in PFAS exposure in the homes of pregnant people based on paired serum and dust samples. This built a clearer picture of which PFAS and at what quantities they exist in these homes, how they relate to each other, and how they are tied to sociodemographic and housing factors. Our results demonstrate that exposure to PFAS via house dust may contribute up to 25% of total exposure for adults, highlighting the importance of understanding what drives residential exposures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.