Trial reportPatient education and counseling2025
The feasibility of sharing digital audio-recordings of clinic visits online with older adults in primary care settings: A multisite trial.
Trial report in Patient education and counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Providing routine digital recordings of clinic visits to patients: a multiple-case study of three settings in the U.S.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Using the Behaviour Change Wheel framework to develop an integrated intervention for diabetes and hypertension co-management in China: a case report.BMC global and public health · 2025Review
- The opportunities and uncertainties of clinic visit recording for older adults.Age and ageing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this trial was to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of sharing audio recordings of primary care visits with older adults with multimorbidity.
methodsWe used a two-arm, randomized, controlled, feasibility trial with 3-month follow-up. Patients aged ≥ 65 years-with diabetes and hypertension-were recruited from academic primary care settings in New Hampshire, Tennessee, and Texas. Patients were randomized to receive online access to audio recordings of scheduled visits for three-months or care as usual (after visit summaries). Primary outcomes were acceptability and feasibility assessed using several indicators: acceptabilityrecruitment of 90 patients; recording use; and the Appropriateness of Intervention Measure (AIM; >3), feasibility- retention rate; protocol adherence; and the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM; >3). Interviews were conducted with clinicians (n = 14) and patients (n = 19). Exploratory outcomes included patient activation, satisfaction, adherence, and quality of life.
resultsWe met recruitment (n = 91) and retention (98 %) targets and exceeded feasibility (Median FIM 4; IQR 3 - 4) and acceptability (Median AIM 4; IQR 3 - 4) metrics. Fidelity to protocol was high (92 %), and 40 of 45 patients (85 %) accessed their recordings. Interviewees noted the benefits of visit recording, including greater recall, understanding, and family engagement. Recording had little perceived impact on the visit interaction, and concerns about visit recording were minimal. Exploratory outcomes revealed better PROMIS Mental Health Scores for patients receiving Audio compared to Usual Care at 3 months: 51.5 (SD 7.7) vs. 47.7 (SD 9.9), P = 0.04.
conclusionsSharing visit recordings online with older adults is feasible and acceptable. A larger trial is needed to determine the impact of sharing recordings on patient health outcomes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Recording is a highly scalable approach to supporting older adults and their care partners in managing care. Advances in natural language processing may unlock further opportunities for this innovative strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.