ArticleBlood advances2025
Genetic disruption of Blimp-1 drastically augments the antitumor efficacy of BCMA-targeting CAR T cells.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Strategies and mechanisms for the enhancement of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell functions.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Epigenetic editing to advance CAR T cell therapy.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Review
- PRDM1-mediated epigenetic and transcriptional repression mechanisms: a key hub in immune differentiation, tumor progression, and inflammatory responses.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- RVd and CyBorD therapies remodel B-cell maturation signaling and alter immune and clonal architecture in multiple myeloma.Cancer biology & therapy · 2025Article
- Improving CAR T cell therapy against malignancies through gene knock-down/out strategies: a systematic review.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells directed against B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) are an effective treatment for multiple myeloma (MM), but short persistence and frequent relapses are challenges for this immunotherapy. This lack of durability has been attributed to the premature terminal differentiation of CAR T cells, which prevents the formation of long-lived memory cells that maintain antitumor responses. To improve long-term efficacy, we used CRISPR/CRISPR-associated protein 9-mediated gene editing to ablate the expression of the transcription factor Blimp-1. Blimp-1 knockout (KO) CAR T cells displayed a memory-like phenotype compared with control (Mock) CAR T cells, but had reduced effector function, with a striking loss of granzyme B. However, in a murine model of advanced MM, Blimp-1 KO CAR T cells effectively slowed or even prevented disease progression, significantly outperforming Mock CAR T cells in improving survival (P = .006). To understand this enhanced in vivo effectiveness, Blimp-1 KO CAR T cells were characterized after being repeatedly challenged with tumor cells in vitro. In this setting, Blimp-1 KO CAR T cells maintained a highly active state with high expression of memory markers, but, crucially, demonstrated enhanced effector function and increased energetic capacity. RNA-sequencing analysis of tumor-exposed Blimp-1 KO CAR T cells confirmed the presence of a memory-like transcriptomic signature and, additionally, revealed enhanced ribosome biogenesis and repressed CAR T-cell dysfunction as mechanisms that could contribute to improved antitumor activity. Put together, our findings show that dampening Blimp-1 expression altered the phenotype and function of anti-BCMA CAR T cells, leading to augmented therapeutic efficacy in MM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.