Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39642190›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Beyond words: Relationships between emoji use, attachment style, and emotional intelligence.

Simon Dubé, Amanda N Gesselman, Ellen M Kaufman, Margaret Bennett-Brown, Vivian P Ta-Johnson, Justin R Garcia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simon DubéThe Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0003-4947-7937
Amanda N GesselmanThe Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0001-6485-6404
Ellen M KaufmanThe Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
Margaret Bennett-BrownThe Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0002-5509-9429
Vivian P Ta-JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, Lake Forest College, Lake Forest, Illinois, United States of America.
Justin R GarciaThe Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0002-5198-4578

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing the relationships between emoji use and traits related to communication and interpersonal skills can provide insights into who employs emojis and the psychological mechanisms underlying computer-mediated communications. This online study investigated associations between emoji use frequency, attachment style, and emotional intelligence across genders and relationship types in a Mechanical Turk sample of 320 adults (≥18y; 191 women, 123 men, and 4 transgender individuals). Correlational analyses showed that emotional intelligence was positively related to emoji use with friends, while avoidant attachment was negatively related to emoji use with friends and dating or romantic partners. This pattern of associations varied across genders and relationship types, with women using emojis more frequently than men with friends and family. Such findings suggest that individuals higher on emotional intelligence with secure attachment may employ emojis more frequently across contexts where more conventional non-verbal cues are lacking. These findings are important given the prevalence of virtual communications in our everyday lives.

Indexed as

Emotional IntelligenceInterpersonal RelationsObject AttachmentAdolescentAdultCommunicationEmotionsFemaleFriendsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSexual PartnersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39642190
PMCPMC11623465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.