Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39642168›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

OneNet-One network to rule them all: Consensus network inference from microbiome data.

Camille Champion, Raphaëlle Momal, Emmanuelle Le Chatelier, Mathilde Sola, Mahendra Mariadassou, Magali Berland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Camille ChampionUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MGP, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Raphaëlle MomalUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MGP, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Emmanuelle Le ChatelierUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MGP, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Mathilde SolaUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MGP, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Mahendra MariadassouUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MaIAGE, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Magali BerlandUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MGP, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6762-5350

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR, anr.fr)Carnot Qualiment (qualiment.fr)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling microbial interactions as sparse and reproducible networks is a major challenge in microbial ecology. Direct interactions between the microbial species of a biome can help to understand the mechanisms through which microbial communities influence the system. Most state-of-the art methods reconstruct networks from abundance data using Gaussian Graphical Models, for which several statistically grounded and computationnally efficient inference approaches are available. However, the multiplicity of existing methods, when applied to the same dataset, generates very different networks. In this article, we present OneNet, a consensus network inference method that combines seven methods based on stability selection. This resampling procedure is used to tune a regularization parameter by computing how often edges are selected in the networks. We modified the stability selection framework to use edge selection frequencies directly and combine them in the inferred network to ensure that only reproducible edges are included in the consensus. We demonstrated on synthetic data that our method generally led to slightly sparser networks while achieving much higher precision than any single method. We further applied the method to gut microbiome data from liver-cirrothic patients and demonstrated that the resulting network exhibited a microbial guild that was meaningful in terms of human health.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaHumansMicrobial Interactions

Identifiers

PMID39642168
PMCPMC11654977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.