ArticlePloS one2024
Can agricultural technological progress promote China's interprovincial rural revitalization? an analytical perspective based on agricultural-scale operations.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To clarify the role of agricultural technological progress in the process of rural revitalization, this paper uses the agricultural panel data of 31 provinces in China from 2007 to 2020 to measure the Total Factor Productivity of agriculture, analyzes the impact direction and spatial spillover effect of agricultural technological progress on China's rural revitalization through the spatial Durbin model, and analyzes the threshold mechanism of agricultural technological progress on China's rural revitalization by using the panel threshold model. The results are as follows: (1) The spatial and geographical agglomeration of interprovincial rural revitalization in China has gradually weakened, and the regional imbalance has improved; (2) The progress in agricultural technology plays a positive role in promoting China's interprovincial rural revitalization, and the overall nonlinear characteristics of "first inhibiting and then promoting" are presented, and the conclusion is still robust after fully considering the factors of time, region and economic distance; (3) Further analysis shows that the impact of agricultural technological progress on China's interprovincial rural revitalization is based on the threshold constraints of land-scale operation and agricultural-industry agglomeration, and shows significant spatial heterogeneity. The inherent reason is that whether the land-scale operation entity adopts long-term investment decisions such as new agricultural technology depends on the expectation of land management risk stability, while agricultural-industry agglomeration hinders the diffusion and spillover of agricultural technology due to the exclusive characteristics of agricultural production geographical locations. Therefore, in the future of China's rural revitalization, the government should guide the large-scale operation of land and agricultural production according to local conditions to give full play to the positive spillover effect and spatial radiation capacity of agricultural technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.