Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39642140›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Assessment of front and back of pack nutrition labels of selected convenience food products and snacks available in the Indian market.

Shanmugam Shobana, Gopalakrishnan Sangavi, Ramatu Wuni, Bakshi Priyanka, Arun Leelavady, Dhanushkodi Kayalvizhi, Ranjit Mohan Anjana, Kamala Krishnaswamy, Karani Santhanakrishnan Vimaleswaran, Viswanathan Mohan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shanmugam ShobanaDepartment of Diabetes Food Technology, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7261-0479
Gopalakrishnan SangaviDepartment of Diabetes Food Technology, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ramatu WuniHugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition, Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences and Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research (ICMR), University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
Bakshi PriyankaDepartment of Diabetes Food Technology, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Arun LeelavadyDepartment of Diabetes Food Technology, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Dhanushkodi KayalvizhiDepartment of Diabetes Food Technology, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ranjit Mohan AnjanaDepartment of Diabetology, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kamala KrishnaswamyNational Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, India.
Karani Santhanakrishnan VimaleswaranHugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition, Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences and Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research (ICMR), University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
Viswanathan MohanDepartment of Diabetology, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrition labels on packaged food items provide at-a-glance information about the nutritional composition of the food, serving as a quick guide for consumers to assess the quality of food products. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the nutritional information on the front and back of pack labels of selected packaged foods in the Indian market. A total of 432 food products in six categories (idli mix, breakfast cereals, porridge mix, soup mix, beverage mix and extruded snacks) were investigated by a survey. Nutritional profiling of the foods was done based on the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) claims regulations. The healthiness of the packaged foods was assessed utilising nutritional traffic light system. The products were classified into 'healthy', 'moderately healthy' and 'less healthy' based on the fat, saturated fat, and sugar content. Most of the food products evaluated belong to healthy' and 'moderately healthy' categories except for products in extruded snacks. Reformulation of 'extruded snacks' are necessary to decrease the total and saturated fat content. The nutrient content claims were classified using the International Network for Food and Obesity / NCDs Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS) taxonomy. Protein, dietary fibre, fat, sugar, vitamins and minerals were the most referred nutrients in the nutrient content claims. Breakfast cereal carried highest number of nutritional claims while porridge mix had the lowest number of claims. The overall compliance of the nutrient content claims for the studied food products is 80.5%. This study gives an overall view about the nutritional quality of the studied convenience food products and snacks in Indian market.

Indexed as

Fast FoodsFood LabelingNutritive ValueSnacksHumansIndia

Identifiers

PMID39642140
PMCPMC11623555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.