Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39642116›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement.

Peter Vickers, Ludovica Adamo, Mark Alfano, Cory Clark, Eleonora Cresto, He Cui, Haixin Dang, Finnur Dellsén, Nathalie Dupin, Laura Gradowski and 26 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Peter VickersDepartment of Philosophy, University of Durham, Durham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5644-4290
Ludovica AdamoSchool of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Mark AlfanoDepartment of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Cory ClarkThe Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3083-9179
Eleonora CrestoInstitute for Philosophical Research - SADAF, National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
He CuiDepartment of Philosophy, University of Durham, Durham, United Kingdom.
Haixin DangDepartment of Philosophy, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Finnur DellsénFaculty of Philosophy, History, and Archeology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Nathalie DupinSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Laura GradowskiDepartment of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Simon GrafSchool of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2235-8639
Aline GuevaraScience Communication Unit, Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Mark HallapDepartment of Philosophy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Jesse HamiltonDepartment of Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Mariann HardeyDurham University Business School, University of Durham, Durham, United Kingdom.
Paula HelmDepartment of Media and Culture, University of Amsterdam (UvA), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Asheley LandrumWalter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3074-804X
Neil LevyDepartment of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Edouard MacheryDepartment of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Sarah MillsDepartment of Philosophy, University of Durham, Durham, United Kingdom.
Seán MullerJohannesburg Institute for Advanced Study, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Joanne SheppardJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.
Shinod N KDepartment of Philosophy, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India.
Matthew SlaterDepartment of Philosophy, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1982-2656
Jacob StegengaLeverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Henning StrandinDepartment of Philosophy, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Michael T StuartDepartment of Philosophy, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
David SweetDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Ufuk TasdanDepartment of Philosophy, University of Durham, Durham, United Kingdom.
Henry TaylorDepartment of Philosophy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Owen TowlerDepartment of Philosophy, University of Durham, Durham, United Kingdom.
Dana TulodzieckiDepartment of Philosophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Heidi TworekDepartment of History and School of Public Policy and Global Affairs, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Rebecca WallbankDepartment of Philosophy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Harald WiltscheDivision of Philosophy and Applied Ethics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Samantha Mitchell FinniganAdvanced Research Computing, University of Durham, Durham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0167-080X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world's scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a '10 second survey', where the participant is presented with a single statement to consider, and a standard five-point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPublic OpinionSARS-CoV-2ScienceSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39642116
PMCPMC11623554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.