ArticleHealth literacy research and practice2024
Health Literacy Promotion and Digital Interventions for Depressive Disorders.
Article in Health literacy research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe lack of therapeutic treatment options for depressive disorders increases the relevance of digital interventions for patients and general practitioners (GPs), particularly to bridge waiting times. However, patients may require adequate (digital) health literacy (HL) to partake in such interventions.
objectiveThis study contrasts expected benefits and risks of digital mental health interventions, specifically digital therapeutics on prescription (DTx), among GPs and patients with depression according to HL dimensions (access, understanding, appraisal, and application) and patients' personal determinants.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with purposively sampled GPs ( KEY
resultsDTx include benefits to access health information and promote HL as DTx can improve understanding of health content and foster self-management skills. But DTx also implies risks for routine care distribution and creates new media barriers. During waiting times patients appraise DTx for themselves as more positive than GPs expect. However, digital- and disease-specific challenges such as non-commitment, listlessness or lethargy appear to hinder the use of DTx in practical situations. While GPs were not convinced about the digital skills of their patients, patients raised concerns that depressive symptoms may inhibit them from actual use.
conclusionIn the context of DTx for depressive disorders, patients' mental health needs are seldom noticed and rarely promoted. To foster (digital) HL, DTx should be comprehensively embedded in supply situations. [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.