ArticleMedical care2025
Health System Expansion and Changes in Medicare Beneficiary Utilization of Safety Net Providers.
Article in Medical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence is limited on insured patients' use of safety net providers as vertically integrated health systems spread throughout the United States.
objectivesTo examine whether market-level health system penetration is associated with: (1) switches in Medicare beneficiaries' usual source of primary care from federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) to health systems; and (2) FQHCs' overall Medicare patient and visit volume. RESEARCH
designBeneficiary-level discrete-time survival analysis and market-level linear regression analysis using Medicare fee-for-service claims data from 2013 to 2018. SUBJECTS: A total of 659,652 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 and older lived in one of 27,386 empirically derived primary care markets whose usual source of care in 2013 was an FQHC or a non-FQHC-independent physician organization that predominantly served low-income patients. MEASURES: Beneficiary-year measure of the probability of switching to health system-affiliated physician organizations and market-year measures of the number of FQHC visits by Medicare beneficiaries, number of beneficiaries attributed to FQHCs, and FQHC Medicare market shares.
resultsDuring 2013-2018, 16.5% of beneficiaries who sought care from FQHCs switched to health systems. When health system penetration increases from the 25th to 75th percentile, the probability of Medicare FQHC patient switching increases by 4.6 percentage points, with 22 fewer Medicare FQHC visits and 4 fewer beneficiaries attributed to FQHCs per market year. Complex patients and patients who sought care from non-FQHC, independent physician organizations exhibited higher rates of switching to health systems.
conclusionsHealth system expansion was associated with the loss of Medicare patients by FQHCs, suggesting potential negative spillovers of vertical integration on independent safety net providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.