Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39642002›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2025

Characterization of upper esophageal sphincter pressures relative to vocal acoustics.

Jesse D Hoffmeister, Jürgen Konczak, Stephanie N Misono

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jesse D HoffmeisterDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8891-5907
Jürgen KonczakSchool of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4422-5610
Stephanie N MisonoDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UM1TR004405 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Bruce R Blazar, Damien A Fair · 2023 to 2026
$30.8M
Dystonia Coalition- Pilot ProjectU54NS116025 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JINNAH, HYDER A · 2019 to 2023
$7.1M
Dystonia CoalitionU54NS065701 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JINNAH, HYDER A · 2009 to 2014
$7.0M
CTSA K12 Program at University of MinnesotaK12TR004373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI David H Ingbar · 2024 to 2026
$3.2M
Dystonia CoalitionU54TR001456 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JINNAH, HYDER A · 2015 to 2016
$2.5M
Graduate Training in the NeurosciencesT32NS116024 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MATTHEW N RASBAND · 2020 to 2026
$2.1M
Psychological factors influencing voice outcomes: Technology-based assessment and interventionK23DC016335 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MISONO, STEPHANIE · 2017 to 2021
$1.0M
Dystonia Coalition (DC) NS065701Dystonia Coalition (DC) NS116025Dystonia Coalition (DC) TR001456HHS | NIH | National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) K23DC016335NCATS NIH HHS K12 TR004373NCATS NIH HHS U54 TR001456NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004405NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC016335NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS116024NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS065701NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS116025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strength of vocal fold adduction has been hypothesized to be a critical factor influencing vocal acoustics but has been difficult to measure directly during phonation. Recent work has suggested that upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure, which can be easily assessed, increases with stronger vocal fold adduction, raising the possibility that UES pressure might indirectly reflect vocal fold adduction strength. However, concurrent UES pressure and vocal acoustics have not previously been examined across different vocal tasks. Doing so may offer insights into the potential use of UES pressure for relative quantification of the strength of vocal fold adduction and how this might contribute to vocal acoustics across different vocal tasks. We assessed UES pressure relative to vocal acoustics in 32 vocally healthy adults during sustained vowels, whispered sentences, and spoken sentences. Smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPs) and low-to-high spectral energy ratio (LHR) were derived from the acoustic signal. After controlling for resting UES pressure, age, and sex, we observed significant negative correlations between UES pressure and CPPs and a significant positive correlation between UES pressure and LHR. UES pressures were significantly higher during spoken sentences than whispered sentences and sustained vowels. Measuring UES pressure relative to vocal acoustics is a novel methodology for studying upper aerodigestive tract physiology during phonation and has the potential to enhance understanding of voice disruption in clinical populations. Clinical implications and considerations for implementation are discussed.

Indexed as

Esophageal Sphincter, UpperPhonationPressureVocal CordsAcousticsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpeech AcousticsVoiceYoung Adultadduction strengthdysphoniahigh-resolution manometrylarynxphonation

Identifiers

PMID39642002
PMCPMC12212895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.