Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39641926›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Clinical Benefits and Utility of Pretherapeutic DPYD and UGT1A1 Testing in Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the PREPARE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Rossana Roncato, Alessia Bignucolo, Elena Peruzzi, Marcella Montico, Elena De Mattia, Luisa Foltran, Michela Guardascione, Mario D'Andrea, Adolfo Favaretto, Fabio Puglisi and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03093818 (PREemptive Pharmacogenomic Testing for Preventing Adverse Drug REactions), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03093818 nacompletednot on this map

PREemptive Pharmacogenomic Testing for Preventing Adverse Drug REactions

TypeinterventionalSponsorJ.J.SwenRan2017 to 2021Enrolled6,950ConditionsAdverse Drug ReactionArmsPharmacogenomic testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Implementation ofJCO precision oncology · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Improving the Dosing Schedules of Targeted Anticancer Agents.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rossana RoncatoExperimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Alessia BignucoloExperimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Elena PeruzziExperimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Marcella MonticoClinical Trial Office, Scientific Direction, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Elena De MattiaExperimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Luisa FoltranDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Michela GuardascioneDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Mario D'AndreaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo / Ospedale Padre Pio, Civitavecchia, Rome, Italy.
Adolfo FavarettoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda ULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana Distretto di Treviso, Treviso, Italy.
Fabio PuglisiDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Jesse Joachim SwenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Henk-Jan GuchelaarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Giuseppe ToffoliExperimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Erika CecchinExperimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: To date, the clinical benefit and utility of implementing a DPYD/UGT1A1 pharmacogenetic-informed therapy with fluoropyrimidines and/or irinotecan have not been prospectively investigated. Objective: To examine clinically relevant toxic effects, hospitalizations, and related costs while preserving treatment intensity and efficacy outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nonprespecified secondary analysis stems from Pre-Emptive Pharmacogenomic Testing for Preventing Adverse Drug Reactions (PREPARE), a multicenter, controlled, open, block-randomized, crossover implementation trial conducted from March 7, 2017, to June 30, 2020, and includes data from Italy according to a sequential study design. The study population included 563 patients (intervention, 252; control [standard of care], 311) with gastrointestinal cancer (age ≥18 years) who were eligible for fluoropyrimidine and/or irinotecan treatment. Data analysis for the present study was performed from May 27 to October 10, 2024. Interventions: Participants with actionable variants (DPYD*2A, DPYD*13, .DPYD c.2846A>T, and DPYD c.1236G>A for fluoropyrimidines, and UGT1A1*28, UGT1A1*6, and UGT1A1*27 for irinotecan) received drug or dose adjustments based on Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group recommendations. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was clinically relevant toxic effects (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥4 hematologic, grade ≥3 nonhematologic, or causing hospitalization, fluoropyrimidines and/or irinotecan causally related). Secondary outcomes included hospitalization rates, toxic effect management costs, intensity of treatment, quality-adjusted life-years, and 3-year overall survival. Results: Overall, 1232 patients were enrolled in Italy, with 563 included in this analysis (317 [56.3%] men; median age, 68.0 [IQR, 60.0-75.0] years). In the intervention arm, carriers of any actionable genotype exhibited a 90% lower risk of clinically relevant toxic effects compared with the control arm (odds ratio, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0-0.8; P = .04). They also presented higher toxic effect management costs per patient ($4159; 95% CI, $1510-$6810) compared with patients in the intervention arm ($26; 95% CI, 0-$312) (P = .004) and a higher rate of hospitalization (34.8% vs 11.8%; P = .12). The differences were not significant among all patients. Three-year overall survival did not differ significantly between arms, while quality-adjusted life-years significantly improved in the intervention arm. The pharmacogenetics-informed approach did not manifest a detrimental effect on treatment intensity in actionable genotype carriers. Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of PREPARE, pretreatment application of DPYD- and UGT1A1-guided treatment appeared to increase safety and reduce hospitalizations and related costs in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Clinical benefit did not appear to be affected. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03093818.

Indexed as

Dihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsGlucuronosyltransferaseIrinotecanAgedCross-Over StudiesFemaleFluorouracilHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPharmacogenomic TestingUGT1A1 EnzymeDihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)FluorouracilGlucuronosyltransferaseIrinotecanUGT1A1 Enzyme

Identifiers

PMID39641926
PMCPMC11624585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.