Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39641883›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2025

A Qualitative Analysis of Trialogues Between People with Lived Experience, Their Relatives, and Mental Health Professionals.

Francisco José Eiroa-Orosa, María Incera-Rosas

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francisco José Eiroa-OrosaSection of Personality, Evaluation, and Psychological Treatment, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, School of Psychology, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. feiroa@ub.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4163-6545
María Incera-RosasSection of Personality, Evaluation, and Psychological Treatment, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, School of Psychology, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0009-0009-5388-7753

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2021-125403OA-I00Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación RYC2018-023850-I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trialogue meetings, aligned with the Recovery model in mental healthcare, foster the development of a shared language and mutual understanding among persons with lived experience, their relatives, and professionals. This study analysed the first mental health trialogue experience in Barcelona, involving six meetings with thirteen voluntary participants over three months. Using qualitative methods for data collection and reflexive thematic analysis, three main themes emerged: Recovery process, Interaction with mental health services, and Trialogue dynamics. Benefits included open dialogues in a safe space, learning from diverse perspectives, and sharing expertise. The meetings created an environment of empathy and respect while promoting open communication. This approach holds substantial potential for transforming mental healthcare systems, suggesting trialogues can be an effective tool for enhancing communication within community-based mental health initiatives. The findings provide a comprehensive picture of the trialogue process, highlighting its potential to foster mutual understanding among participants.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesFamilyHealth PersonnelMental DisordersAdultCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSpainCommunity-based participatory researchMental healthRecovery

Identifiers

PMID39641883
PMCPMC11968523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.